The General Harvard Separation Axiom (Execution Semantics Theory)

Published January 21, 2026

Properties:

Let G be a theory that formally defines execution semantics (domains, contexts, authority). Let O be any theory of computational behavior.

  • If O models computation, then O requires execution to occur.
  • Therefore O implicitly depends on G's primitives (execution must be defined for computation to be theorized).
  • G does not depend on O (execution semantics are primitive, not derived from computational models).

Conclusion:

We cannot derive G from O without circularity:

  • Deriving execution semantics from O would mean "execution depends on a theory that assumes execution exists"
  • This creates an impossible circular dependency
  • Therefore G must be axiomatic - a foundational primitive that cannot be reduced to other computational theories

Any attempt to make G = O or G O fails because O already assumes G's primitives exist.

Author:

  • Amlal El Mahrouss - amlal@nekernel.org